Monday, April 7, 2008

Wilson Trance All-Court Review

One of the online tennis retailers sent me a pair of Wilson Trance All Court shoes to review. Big props to Tennis Warehouse for trying to get regular players involved with their reviews... I played with them for about 3 weeks, and came up with the following thoughts. I had higher hopes for them, but then again, Wilson shoes haven't had a great track record in my book.


WILSON TRANCE ALL COURT

For the past 3 weeks I have been wearing the Wilson Trance All Court. For some background information, I have a rather wide, E-width foot with a higher arch and a lot of volume trough the middle--a very rectangular shape and admittedly hard foot to fit. For comparison's sake, I currently wear the Yonex SHT-305 in the same size as the Trance All Court. I am a 4.0 player who plays both singles and doubles.

Initial Impressions
I slipped into the Trance AC before playing to test the initial fit. These shoes are stiff out of the box. The leather is tight and not very forgiving at first. After wearing around the house for about two hours the leather did soften a bit, and the next day when I revisited the shoe they felt more comfortable. The leather is not as soft as some, which may be good for durability, but it does take some time to break in.

Fit
During the break-in period, I had trouble with the heel slipping more than I'm accustomed to. I would attribute this to the lacing system and a generous fit in the heel; near the upper part of the lacing pattern there seems to be less holes than other shoes I'm used to. I found that I really had to crank down the laces to stop the heal from slipping. For my wide foot, the forefoot fit was surprisingly good. I would call this a hair wider than a normal "D" width; it was definitely tight, but not pinched--some more break-in during play would later loosen it a bit more. Certainly wider than most Nike's I've tried recently, yet less wide than Yonex and some K-Swiss shoes. I usually dismiss shoes instantly because of the forefoot width, but these I was able to wear. Fit through the middle of the shoe is medium. The shoe has good volume throughout and fit my chunky foot well. Even after 2 weeks I still felt the heel was slipping slightly, but it was manageable if the laces were really tight. The forefoot did loosen up a bit by the end of my test, however I noticed that the wraparound sole on the forefoot probably impeded it from opening up more. The front sole wraps up the side of the forefoot on both medial and lateral sides. While it is great for stability, it also narrows the fit a bit. Again though, for a person with normal D width feet, this probably wouldn't be an issue.

Cushioning and Arch support
This is an area I have a split decision on the Trance AC. The heel is well padded; I felt like the DST Foam did its job and the shoe felt comfortable. The forefoot cushioning on the other hand, is virtually non-existent. I felt as though there was very little to no cushioning up front, and having to live with a former toe injury, I could certainly feel it. I don't know if I've worn a shoe with as little forefoot cushioning as the Trance AC. They do feel low to the ground, but that does not outweigh the lack of cushioning. Arch support is somewhat low. I was unable to feel any real support, whereas on some shoes with medium support, I can feel it working--depending on your foot, this is good or bad obviously.

Traction and Outsole
The Trance AC has a full length herringbone, but the ridges are flattened rather than sharp, a design decision I think lends itself more to hard courts than clay. The outsole is very "sticky" which translated into to very good traction. I had no trouble getting around a hard court in these shoes. However, the rubber on the outsole felt very stiff, causing the shoe to carry a stiff feeling during flex. This may have affected my opinion cushioning as well. On the positive side, with stiffness tends to come durability, and I would bet this is a durable shoe. I rarely wear through outsoles, so it would take a long time for me to comment on durability; however after a number of sessions, the Trance AC maintained its original sticky outsole and good traction. With 3 weeks on them, they are showing virtually no wear.

Stability & Weight
I had very little issue with stability in this shoe, it does its job well. I felt well planted while moving around the court in the Trance All Court. As mentioned before, the wraparound sole in the forefoot can be felt and aided stability. The wraparound plastic throughout the midfoot felt secure. Again, with minor heel slippage, the shoe felt a bit sloppy at times, but that could be as much my foot type than the shoe design. Weight felt good around the court. I wouldn't call this a speed shoe, but it certainly felt light for a stability shoe. Never did I feel weighed down, nor did they feel clunky. Some heavier shoes just give a plodding feeling; this is not the case in the Trance AC. Being almost all leather, the Trance felt a little warm...might not be a shoe I'd select if I always played on 90+ degree days. In the 50s during my tests, my feet were getting warm, which doesn't bode well for summer. If you like the secure feeling of leather though and don't mind the heat, this shouldn't be an issue.

Final Thoughts
I had mixed feelings about the Trance All Court. If you have a medium width foot and are looking for a stable, solid, and durable shoe with good traction that doesn't have the weight normally associated with that type of shoe, you probably will like this shoe. That being said, if you love straight out of the box comfort and need your shoes to feel like mesh slippers riding on pillows of air, keep looking. It is hard to strike a balance between support and comfort, and Wilson certainly put their money into durability and stability on this one. My final opinion of the Trance All Court is that they are an average shoe with a few bright spots if you know what you're looking for.

Monday, September 3, 2007

Global warming is not a priority. HUH?

That's right. I stumbled upon this very interesting video of a talk given by economist Bjorn Lomborg who works with the Copenhagen Consensus. He explains why economists are the best individuals to prioritize the world's problems, and how why we must do this to tackle them effectively. The surprising factoid in this discussion is that while global warming is given more press than any other problem, it's the last thing we should tackle. Watch the video for further explanation.

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Prince Synthetic Gut Multifilament 17

Just installed this string in one of my Magnetic Tours. Was pretty easy to string up, not as easy as some multis though. I haven't broken these yet, but played 2 doubles matches with them. Initial impressions are "nothing special". This isn't especially soft and doesn't have especially good feel. Durability will be interesting. All in all it's a pretty middle of the road string. It's definitely softer than PSGD 17, but it doesn't have much more feel, which you'd normally see in a multifilament. The $6.50 price point is nice, but I can't see really spending twice the price of PSGD for this. Tension I think has started to dip already after 2 matches. I'll see if it has any redeeming qualities now that it's fully broken in. Some strings just get better w/ use...others not so much. If I don't post on this again, my initial impressions were correct: Performance, B, Price A-... Worth a try, probably not one for the inventory.

Setup: Fischer Magnetic Tour, 57 lbs.

Friday, August 24, 2007

Klip Venom 17

I bought another FMT from a TW board member and it came strung with Klip Venom 17 w/ about one set of use on it. I pretty much abused this string until it was about to snap. Durability for a multi is very good. It has gotten some negative reviews, but I don't really know why... I really enjoyed this string. It seemed soft, and powerful, and seemed to maintain tension pretty well. Usually w/ Gamma strings (notorious for bad tension maintenance) I notice a pretty big drop off after so many sets... not w/ Venom. This had pretty good pop and was smooth around the stringbed. I can't say the feel was outstanding, but it was satisfactory. For $13/set though, not sure I'd spring for it. Performance: A-, Price: C. I'd give this string a B, worth a try if you don't mind the bill.

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

Switched from K6.1 to FMT

I recently switched from the Wilson K-Factor 6.1 16x18 to the Fischer Magnetic Tour. I like the K6.1 b/c it's solid, pretty head light, and I can serve well with it... But my main motivations for moving were these:
  • String eater
  • Heavy during long matches
  • Powerful. Quick-reaction shots could really zip.
The Fischer Magnetic Tour is a lighter stick, and it has a super nice pick-up weight. It just feels like an easy stick to play with. It's got some pop, but less so than the K6.1. I feel like it has more control and a more predictable hit than the K6.1 b/c of the 16x19 pattern. So far it's a little different on the serve. Strings seem to last well in it. And quick shots are so much easier and tend to stay in the court. It's got a great smooth feel to it as well. Fischer rackets just have the same smoothness across the board which I really like. Let's see if she keeps up with me and I stick with these FMT's.

Friday, August 17, 2007

I'm (very) locally famous...

So I started a thread over on the TW board about how resident VLOGist Chris Edwards looks like Survivorman a bit... well, funnily enough I met him & William (vid editor extraordinaire) in Cincinnati the very next week at the ATP Masters event. We chatted for a few min and he asked if I wanted to be in a VLOG. Hell yeah I wanted to... so he interviewed me and I had no idea what he was going to ask. Turns out, he played the Survivorman thing up nicely in the VLOG. Check it out...

http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/vlogpage.html?ccode=VLOG031